tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post3065161499343364398..comments2023-10-23T23:19:01.111+02:00Comments on Object-Oriented Software Development: Tiny ASP.NET Ajax Framework ContestWiktor Zychlahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04420514974154487039noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-73028473005040067392011-07-10T10:22:16.252+02:002011-07-10T10:22:16.252+02:00It seems so easy to learn and apply. It sure is a ...It seems so easy to learn and apply. It sure is a wonderful thing to learn different kinds of application in order to make the best website.ajax tab containerhttp://9tricks.com/web-dev/37-great-javascript-ajax-css-tab-based-for-web-developers/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-53828788759867895402008-05-08T13:36:00.000+02:002008-05-08T13:36:00.000+02:00that's an interesting note and I cannot explain it...that's an interesting note and I cannot explain it. during the recording phase of the test the application performed correctly under vwg.<BR/><BR/>however I admit that I did not analyzed how many request ended with 400 status code during recording of the test.<BR/><BR/>I think then that there are two possibilities:<BR/><BR/>- the test results are correct and the 400 is somehow valid or at least non-cricital to vwg<BR/>- the test resulsts are invalid because Microsoft Application Center Test could not correctly handle concurrent requests to vwg application.<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, I am not able to reproduce any of the tests and frankly, I somehow lost the interest in vwg. I respect the general idea very seriously, however the amount of technical problems hidden inside the framework is still too significant to use it in mission critical applications.Wiktor Zychlahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04420514974154487039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-41691398072106716062008-05-08T13:11:00.000+02:002008-05-08T13:11:00.000+02:00Hey! Have you actually seen your test results? Onl...Hey! Have you actually seen your test results? Only 22% of VWG requests were successful. That's why "The VWG is an undoubt winner". It did nothing in near 80% cases - just did a request and got error response.Ромаhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15231861573992656855noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-12530364047785903912008-05-08T12:54:00.000+02:002008-05-08T12:54:00.000+02:00It's strange that javascript version downloaded mo...It's strange that javascript version downloaded more than VWG. You say that 90k * 200 will be 37 MBs (it's not really so) but you also say that you have only 5 concurrent users. So looks like web browser had to cache scripts after the first request and reuse them. And if the javascript version uses jason it should send/recieve only actual data - in this case VWG result looks a bit like a magic.Ромаhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15231861573992656855noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-29393674624574218252007-07-15T12:48:00.000+02:002007-07-15T12:48:00.000+02:00mark,thank you for the very important information....mark,<BR/><BR/>thank you for the very important information. I will update the article to include your remark so that readers could be aware of it.<BR/><BR/>regards,<BR/>WiktorWiktor Zychlahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04420514974154487039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-91890851646891437152007-07-12T13:36:00.000+02:002007-07-12T13:36:00.000+02:00You were unable to test Ajaxium in the environment...<B>You were unable to test Ajaxium in the environment you described.</B><BR/><BR/>The <B>evaluation edition</B> available freely on vendor's website DOES NOT SUPPORT CONCURRENT CONNECTIONS. That's just a limitation of the evaluation edition. Before testing the component for <I>"200 sessions simulated for 5 concurrent users"</I> you had to ask vendor for a version with all limitations removed.<BR/><BR/><B>So: if Ajaxium Evaluation Edition was able to serve more than 100 requests per second, being limited for only 1 connection at a time, it is the fastest component among all compared.</B><BR/><BR/>Regards,<BR/>Mark Krapovek,<BR/>Ajaxium Support ManagerUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14883009199229399986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-13477948594530189782007-06-28T20:37:00.000+02:002007-06-28T20:37:00.000+02:00Test were performed using Microsoft Application Ce...Test were performed using Microsoft Application Center Test, the tool shipped with Visual Studio .NET 2003 Enterprise Architect.<BR/><BR/>I belive that other smiliar tools exist but never tried anything other than MACT.<BR/><BR/>Regards,<BR/>WiktorWiktor Zychlahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04420514974154487039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8263949408347549596.post-15935461717382321082007-06-28T15:38:00.000+02:002007-06-28T15:38:00.000+02:00HiNice information test, i am working with VWG too...Hi<BR/>Nice information test, i am working with VWG too and I would like to know how did you do this kind of tests??<BR/><BR/>Thanks a lotNelsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01434141800378628904noreply@blogger.com